ArticleWork (Reading, Mass.)2026
Comparison of pain, depression, quality of life, grip strength, and balance according to physical activity levels in office workers.
Article in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundMusculoskeletal problems are commonly observed among office workers.ObjectiveThis study aims to examine whether levels of physical activity are associated with differences in pain, depressive symptoms, quality of life, grip strength, and balance in office workers.Methods61 office workers (29 men and 32 women) who regularly used computers were included in the study. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Health-Related Quality of Life-4 for measuring the Quality of Life, the Visual Analog Scale for measuring pain, the Beck Depression Inventory for measuring mental health, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form for measuring physical activity, the Biodex Balance System for measuring balance, and two distinct methods for measuring grip strength-the Jamar and Handgrip dynamometers-were all used in the assessments.ResultsA significant difference in pain during activity was found among the physical activity levels (inactive, minimally active, highly active) (p < 0.05). There was no difference in depression scores between the groups (p > 0.05). General quality of life scores were higher in the highly active group compared to both the inactive (p = 0.016) and minimally active (p = 0.020) groups. Right and left hand grip strength assessed with Jamar (p = 0.004, p = 0.044; respectively) and right hand grip strength assessed with handgrip (p = 0.04) were statistically significantly higher in the highly active group than in the inactive group. For balance with eyes open, anterior-posterior stabilization scores were significantly better in the highly active group compared to the inactive group (p = 0.004).ConclusionsPhysically active office workers exhibited superior outcomes in activity pain, quality of life, grip strength and balance compared to their less active counterparts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.