Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41529789›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroendocrinology2026

We must look beyond primary reinforcement to understand nicotine use in women.

Kathleen R McNealy, Scott T Barrett, Rick A Bevins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroendocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kathleen R McNealyUniversity of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Nutritional Sciences, United States. Electronic address: kathleen.mcnealy@uky.edu.
Scott T BarrettUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Psychology, United States.
Rick A BevinsUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Psychology, United States.

Funding

Testing the Efficacy of Ibudilast to Attenuate Meth-seeking and Associated Synaptic Inflammation at the Synapse (TEAMS)P20GM130461 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI KIMBERLY A TYLER · 2019 to 2026
$20.6M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001997 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI PENDERGAST, JULIE S, STOOPS, WILLIAM WALTON · 2016 to 2025
$4.2M
Understanding and mitigating exacerbated nicotine use resulting from Pavlovianinteroceptive conditioningR01DA057208 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI Rick A Bevins · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
Contraceptive hormone impacts on the primary reinforcing and reward-enhancing effects of nicotineR36DA059867 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI MCNEALY, KATHLEEN ROBIN · 2024 to 2025
$107k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001997NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA057208NIDA NIH HHS R36 DA059867NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women exhibit greater nicotine use vulnerability than men. Common cessation treatments are less effective for women, suggesting unique contributors to women's smoking that are not fully characterized or targeted by available treatments. High estradiol is associated with enhanced smoking and cessation difficulty, whereas high progesterone is associated with reduced smoking and better cessation success. Hormonal contraceptives can produce similar or even outsized alterations in nicotine use outcomes. Despite clear effects of natural and synthetic sex steroid hormones on nicotine intake, the behavioral pathways by which hormones alter nicotine use outcomes remain unmapped. In this review paper, we propose that uncovering such mechanisms requires examining sex steroid hormone modulation of non-primary reinforcement factors in our animal models. Parallel effects of natural and synthetic sex steroid hormones on nicotine self-administration occur in animal models. Further, women's smoking is more influenced by environmental stimuli, such as the smell, taste, and visual cues associated with nicotine use than by the reinforcing effects of nicotine. In building our case, we first summarize research supporting the import of environmental factors in nicotine intake for women and translation to female rats. We also synthesize findings on how biological sex and sex steroid hormones influence these mechanisms in humans and rats. Lastly, we will detail promising directions for future research.

Indexed as

Gonadal Steroid HormonesNicotineReinforcement, PsychologyTobacco Use DisorderAnimalsFemaleHumansGonadal Steroid HormonesNicotineContraceptivescuesEstradiolnicotine use disorderProgesteroneSelf-administrationSmokingVaping

Identifiers

PMID41529789
PMCPMC13067194

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.