ArticleBMJ open2026
Three decades of clinical trials in Portuguese-speaking Africa: a comprehensive scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPublished clinical trials offer valuable insights into the clinical research landscape in Portuguese-speaking African countries (PSAC)-Angola, Cabo Verde, Guinea-Bissau, São Tomé and Príncipe and Mozambique. The objective of this comprehensive scoping review is to systematically map and analyse randomised clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating pharmacological interventions conducted in PSAC from 1995 to 2024, in order to identify research trends, targeted diseases, geographic distribution and evidence gaps to better understand the development and evolution of clinical trials in the region. This is the first comprehensive scoping review to examine the clinical trials landscape in PSAC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review adheres to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, which builds on the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework (refined by Levac ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. Results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, conference presentation and in plain language in social media, both in Portuguese and in English. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: This protocol is registered in the Open Science Framework https://osf.io/5nhc9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.