Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41530140›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

Cognitive and emotional effects of bilateral prefrontal anodal tDCS and high-frequency tRNS in schizophrenia: a randomized sham-controlled study.

Eisa Jafari, Ali Moghadamzadeh, Zahra Vaziri, Akbar Atadokht, Ali Fathi Jouzdani, Roi Cohen Kadosh, Michael A Nitsche, Daniel M Blumberger, Mohammad Ali Salehinejad

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06155786 (Cognitive Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06155786 nacompletednot on this map

Cognitive Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS) in Schizophrenia: A Random, Crossover Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe National Brain Mapping Laboratory (NBML)Ran2023 to 2024Enrolled36ConditionsSchizophrenia, Cognitive ImpairmentArmstranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) active stimulator, transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) sham stimulator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eisa JafariDepartment of Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran. dr.jafari@pnu.ac.ir.
Ali MoghadamzadehDepartment of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra VaziriDepartment of Neuroscience and Behavior, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Akbar AtadokhtDepartment of Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
Ali Fathi JouzdaniSchool of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-929X
Roi Cohen KadoshSchool of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Michael A NitscheDepartment of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.
Daniel M BlumbergerTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8422-5818
Mohammad Ali SalehinejadDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. msalehinejad@ukaachen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1913-4677

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia significantly hinder functional outcomes and often remain unresponsive to conventional treatments. While initial evidence suggested potential pro-cognitive effects of electrical brain stimulation in schizophrenia, recent meta-analyses have not supported these findings, warranting further investigation on intervention optimization. This sham-controlled crossover study explored cognitive and emotional effects of bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) in schizophrenia. Thirty-six male patients with schizophrenia participated in a crossover trial, receiving three sessions (tDCS, tRNS, sham) in counterbalanced order with 1-week intervals. tDCS and tRNS sessions involved 20-min 2 mA anodal stimulation and 2 mA 100-640 Hz random noise stimulation targeting the left and right DLPFCs (F3-F4) with two extracephalic return electrodes. Executive functions (working memory, spatial planning) were assessed during stimulation, and emotional changes were measured with the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) pre- and post-stimulation. Additionally, side effects and blinding efficacy were evaluated. Both bilateral DLPFC anodal tDCS and high-frequency tRNS significantly improved planning performance (mean problems solved, mean number of moves) compared to sham, with tRNS additionally enhancing working memory accuracy and strategy score. Both interventions increased positive affect and reduced negative affect after the intervention, with tRNS showing greater enhancement of positive emotions. Reduced negative affect after tRNS was correlated with improved executive planning. Side effects were minimal, and blinding was effective for the sham condition. Bilateral DLPFC anodal tDCS and high-frequency tRNS show promise as adjunctive treatments for schizophrenia, especially for cognitive deficits, with broader cognitive and emotional benefits observed with tRNS. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06155786 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06155786 .

Identifiers

PMID41530140
PMCPMC12949120

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.