ArticleScientific reports2026
Phosphorus recovery from Indian sewage sludge by acidification and precipitation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phosphorus (P) recovery from sewage sludge offers potential for nutrient recycling in agriculture and is supported by India’s 2023 Draft National Policy on Fertilizer Management. This study investigates P recovery from five sewage sludge samples collected from sewage treatment plants in Kanpur and Delhi, with P concentrations ranging from 2.34 ± 0.03 to 15.80 ± 2.05 g P/kg dry matter. However, heavy metal concentrations, particularly cadmium (Cd) and chromium (Cr), exceeded Indian compost regulations, making direct land application unsuitable without further treatment. To assess recovery potential, sludge samples underwent 1-hour acidification. Between 17 and 48% of P was released at pH 3.5–4.5, considered optimal for minimizing chemical input. However, Cd, nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn) were solubilized below pH 5, and Cr, copper (Cu), and lead (Pb) below pH 3. Subsequent precipitation from pH 3 leachates achieved 80–88% P recovery, but the final products exceeded international limits for Cr, Cd, arsenic (As), Ni, and Zn, even after citric acid treatment for heavy metal complexation. While the process demonstrates technical feasibility, as established in European contexts, the lower P concentrations in Indian sludge and the co-leaching of heavy metals present major challenges. With chemical costs estimated at 37–99$/kg of recovered P, the process is not yet economically viable compared to subsidized synthetic fertilizers at 0.76 $/kgP. Additionally, the absence of regulatory standards for mineral recycling fertilizers in India further limits the potential for scaling, underscoring the need for clear guidelines to foster product safety and market acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.