ReviewNature genetics2026
The predicament of heritable confounders.
Review in Nature genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying significant associations between genetic loci and psychiatric disorders is dependent on very large sample sizes. Methods for diagnosing diseases on this scale, such as the use of self-assessment questionnaires and data from electronic health records, incorporate heritable variation unrelated to the disease of interest into the diagnosis. Consequently, genetic mapping will identify loci unrelated to the target disease while missing some that are related, and genetic correlations cannot be used to infer the genetic relationships between diseases and between cohorts. Furthermore, shared biases between different disorders appear as shared etiology. As sample sizes grow, such confounders propagate, and findings based on their presence are replicated and extended. Here, we draw attention to the problem, make suggestions for flagging affected cohorts, and discuss future data collection and machine learning approaches to mitigate the effects of heritable confounders in psychiatric disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.