SynthesisGeroScience2026
Group dance interventions for community dwelling older adults to prevent and treat sarcopenia: a mixed methods systematic review.
Synthesis in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Group dance is an engaging physical activity that may benefit the prevention and management of sarcopenia among older adults. However, current evidence on this topic is limited. We aimed to evaluate published evidence on group dance for sarcopenia in community dwelling older adults. Studies published in English and Chinese between 2014 and 2024 were identified through searches in MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO via Ovid, CINAHL via EBSCO, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang, Google Scholar, and Web of Science Core Collection. Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Quantitative data were meta-analysed, and qualitative findings were analysed using thematic analysis. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024554152). 24 studies were included, comprising 1840 participants across 12 countries and involving nine types of group dance interventions. Meta-analysis showed significant improvements in the Short Physical Performance Battery (MD = 1.32, 95%CI: 0.56, 2.08, I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.