Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41530502›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Detection of parkinson's disease with neuroimaging modalities using machine learning and artificial intelligence: a systematic review.

Faranak Ebrahimian Sadabad, Praveen Honhar, Shakiba Houshi, Seyed Faraz Nejati, Sara Bagherieh, Alexandria Brackett, Fereshteh Yazdanpanah, Salih Cayir, Mahdie Hosseini, Hemant Tagare and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Faranak Ebrahimian Sadabad *Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, School of Medicine, Yale University, 801 Howard Ave, PO Box 208048, New Haven, CT, USA. faranak.ebrahimiansadabad@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6649-7211
Praveen Honhar *Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, School of Medicine, Yale University, 801 Howard Ave, PO Box 208048, New Haven, CT, USA.
Shakiba HoushiSchool of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Seyed Faraz NejatiDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, School of Medicine, Yale University, 801 Howard Ave, PO Box 208048, New Haven, CT, USA.
Sara BagheriehSchool of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Alexandria BrackettCushing/Whitney Medical Library, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Fereshteh YazdanpanahDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Salih CayirDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, School of Medicine, Yale University, 801 Howard Ave, PO Box 208048, New Haven, CT, USA.
Mahdie HosseiniDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Hemant TagareDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, School of Medicine, Yale University, 801 Howard Ave, PO Box 208048, New Haven, CT, USA.
David MatuskeyDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, School of Medicine, Yale University, 801 Howard Ave, PO Box 208048, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

In vivo synaptic and dopamine transporter imaging in Parkinson's diseaseR01NS124819 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID A MATUSKEY · 2022 to 2026
$2.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS124819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in medical imaging is an emerging area of interest, particularly in the context of clinical decision-making. Here, we report on the overall performance (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy) of commonly used ML/AI techniques including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), support vector machines (SVMs), random forests, and ensemble approaches on the clinically relevant task of distinguishing between Parkinson’s disease (PD) participants and matched healthy controls (HC). Our systematic review includes 130 studies from six different imaging modalities – dopamine transporter scans ([123I]Ioflupane single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)), positron emission tomography (PET) including [18F]FDG, [18F]DOPA, and [11C]raclopride, structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (T1- and T2-weighted), functional MRI, and diffusion MRI. While some findings were in line with expectations for some modalities, such as the superior performance of dopamine SPECT and PET (> 90% sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with methods like convolutional neural networks), others were more nuanced with the best-performing class of algorithms depending on the imaging modality, and sometimes, even the data source. Overall, we summarize the emerging trends across studies for each imaging technique and provide valuable recommendations for future lines of inquiry.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningNeuroimagingParkinson DiseaseBrainConvolutional Neural NetworksDopaminergic ImagingHumansPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonArtificial IntelligenceMRIParkinson's diseasePETSPECT

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.