SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
Detection of parkinson's disease with neuroimaging modalities using machine learning and artificial intelligence: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A review of FDG-PET biomarker analysis methods in Parkinson's disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The application of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in medical imaging is an emerging area of interest, particularly in the context of clinical decision-making. Here, we report on the overall performance (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy) of commonly used ML/AI techniques including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), support vector machines (SVMs), random forests, and ensemble approaches on the clinically relevant task of distinguishing between Parkinson’s disease (PD) participants and matched healthy controls (HC). Our systematic review includes 130 studies from six different imaging modalities – dopamine transporter scans ([123I]Ioflupane single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)), positron emission tomography (PET) including [18F]FDG, [18F]DOPA, and [11C]raclopride, structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (T1- and T2-weighted), functional MRI, and diffusion MRI. While some findings were in line with expectations for some modalities, such as the superior performance of dopamine SPECT and PET (> 90% sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with methods like convolutional neural networks), others were more nuanced with the best-performing class of algorithms depending on the imaging modality, and sometimes, even the data source. Overall, we summarize the emerging trends across studies for each imaging technique and provide valuable recommendations for future lines of inquiry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41530502What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.