ArticleCommunications biology2026
Large scale compound selection guided by cell painting reveals activity cliffs and functional relationships.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional structure-based pre-screen compound selection relies on the assumption that chemical similarity implies similar biological activity. This paradigm narrows the exploration of chemical space and often fails to account for functional convergence, where structurally diverse compounds act through distinct targets to produce similar phenotypic effects. As a result, compounds with therapeutic potential may be overlooked. To overcome this constraint, we introduce a training-free, transfer learning-based method for large scale compound preselection that leverages deep phenotypic profiling of human cells. Notably, this enables robust pairwise comparison of phenotypic signatures across any source of the entire JUMP-CP, the largest publicly available cell painting dataset (112,480 compounds), preserving biological signals while mitigating batch effects. Validated across 65 high-throughput assays-including in vitro and in cellulo systems-our method provides efficient pre-screen enrichment of biologically active compounds, bypassing the blind spots of structure-centric approaches. Interestingly, because it is large scale, it also allows for a comprehensive analysis of structure-phenotypic activity relationships, revealing potentially thousands of compound activity cliffs, where minimal chemical changes in structure may result in profound phenotypic shifts. We show that these cliffs capture subtle, atom-level determinants of bioactivity that cannot be accessed by structure-based models. Furthermore, we demonstrate that structurally diverse compounds targeting different genes in the same biological pathway can induce either convergent or opposite phenotypes-a phenomenon validated across 30 pathways, hundreds of genes, and thousands of compounds. Finally, to support the broader community, we propose Phenoseeker, a web-based tool enabling instant retrieval of JUMP-CP compounds with similar phenotypic profiles. Together, these findings position phenotypic profiling not merely as a complementary tool, but as a transformative and scalable framework for navigating chemical space through a biological lens. By capturing rich morphological signatures that reflect functional outcomes-regardless of structural similarity-this approach enables the discovery of bioactive compounds, novel mechanisms of action, and unexpected target-pathway relationships. Applied at the scale of the JUMP-CP dataset, phenotypic profiling emerges as a powerful strategy for prioritizing compounds, illuminating activity cliffs, and accelerating the identification of therapeutically relevant candidates across diverse biological contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.