ReviewScience China. Life sciences2026
Protein foundation models: a comprehensive survey.
Review in Science China. Life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning in multi-omics integration for gastrointestinal cancer biomarker discovery.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein foundation models (pFMs) have emerged as pivotal tools in advancing protein science. By leveraging advanced deep learning architectures trained on large-scale protein datasets, pFMs learn generalizable patterns in proteins, enabling accurate prediction of key protein characteristics and generation of novel proteins with tailored properties. In this review, we provide a comprehensive exploration of the developments, applications, challenges, and prospects of pFMs. We systematically examine the multimodal dataset resources that underpin the development of pFMs, ranging from protein sequences to experimentally resolved and predicted three-dimensional (3D) structures, functional annotations, and interaction networks. We explore the advances in pFMs-spanning autoencoding, autoregressive, diffusion, and flow matching models-and highlight their representative applications across fundamental biological research, protein discovery and engineering, and biomedical applications, thereby illustrating their versatility and impact. We also discuss major challenges, encompassing data bottlenecks, evaluation complexities, and model interpretability. Looking forward, we outline promising research directions, including modelling protein dynamism and interactions, as well as developing integrated virtual cell systems, paving the way for next-generation bioengineering and therapeutic development. This survey offers both a roadmap for computational biologists and a strategic framework for experimentalists who are applying pFMs in their work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41530646What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.