ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2026
ReaGP: integrating residual units and attention mechanisms in convolution neural network for genomic prediction.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVarious methods have been widely utilized to estimate the genomic breeding values (GEBVs) for genomic prediction. Traditional approaches often relied on the assumption of linear regression models, which struggle to effectively capture the nonlinear relationships between limited phenotypic data and high-dimensional genotypic data. Deep learning (DL) provided a powerful solution for addressing nonlinear problems. Herein, we proposed a novel deep learning method, named residual attention genomic prediction (ReaGP), which was characterized by two main features. It employed residual units to mitigate gradient instability and network degradation issues, while leveraging attention mechanisms to enhance the mining of critical feature information. Moreover, genomic data processed with frequency encoding was integrated into ReaGP to achieve a richer feature representation.
resultsWhen assessing the predictive accuracy across three animal datasets and two plant datasets covering 15 traits with varying heritabilities, ReaGP improved predictive performance by 14.41% and 7.78% over linear models specifically genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and BayesB, and by 34.41% and 10.09% over kernel methods namely support vector regression (SVR) and reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS), respectively. ReaGP achieved a 4.35% enhancement on average compared to deep neural network genomic prediction (DNNGP). Furthermore, while ReaGP has more trainable parameters than DNNGP, it requires only half the number of floating-point operations.
conclusionsWe introduced a novel deep learning method for genomic prediction, which integrates residual units, attention mechanisms and frequency-encoded genomic data. Comprehensive evaluation on pig, dairy cow, Huaxi cattle, wheat and rice datasets demonstrated that ReaGP was a promising tool for most traits. Thus, ReaGP could be considered as an efficient deep learning method for genomic prediction in farm animals and crops. The source code in this study is available at https://github.com/LiJing5467/ReaGP .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.