ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026
Integration of habitat radiomics and traditional radiomic features for predicting pathological complete response in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma following neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy: a multicenter comparative study.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEsophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Although immunotherapy has shown promising efficacy for locally advanced ESCC, the lack of reliable predictive tools and the marked heterogeneity of tumors make it difficult to accurately evaluate treatment responses. To address this challenge, we conducted a multicenter study aimed at developing and comparing predictive models based on habitat radiomics and traditional radiomic features to estimate pathological complete response (pCR) in patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Using multicenter data, we systematically assessed the performance of these models to determine the relative advantages of each feature type in predicting treatment outcomes and supporting personalized therapeutic strategies.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed ESCC patient data from three medical centers. Pre-treatment CT imaging was utilized for tumor region segmentation and the extraction of both Habitat Radiomics and traditional Radiomic Features. Feature selection was performed using LASSO regression, and machine learning models were developed based on these features. Several machine learning algorithms, including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest, and XGBoost, were employed for training and validation. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as ROC curves, AUC, sensitivity, and specificity.
resultsThe Habitat Radiomics model achieved AUCs of 0.938 in the training cohort, 0.896 in the internal validation cohort, 0.819 in external validation cohort 1, and 0.846 in external validation cohort 2, demonstrating strong and consistent predictive performance. In comparison, the traditional Radiomics model yielded AUCs of 0.941, 0.845, 0.796, and 0.729, respectively. Beyond higher AUC values, the Habitat Radiomics model also showed superior sensitivity and specificity in predicting pCR. Notably, the combined model that integrated both Habitat and traditional Radiomics features outperformed the individual models, achieving the highest AUC of 0.960 across cohorts and underscoring its superior predictive accuracy.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that Habitat Radiomics features provide significant advantages over traditional Radiomics in predicting immunotherapy response in ESCC patients. The combined model, integrating both feature sets, shows exceptional predictive performance, with promising clinical applications in personalized treatment strategies. Future research will explore the broader applicability of this model across different cancer types and its integration with additional biomarkers to further enhance prediction accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.