ArticleParasites & vectors2026
Population differences in reproductive resource allocation and heterosis in the invasive vector Aedes albopictus.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAn understanding of the traits that favour biological invasions has been considered to be an essential step in predicting which species would become successful invaders. Classical approaches test for differences between invasive versus non-invasive species and emphasize reproduction as a critical phenotype for successful establishment of an invasive species. However, cross-species comparisons underestimate intra-species differences, which may be relevant in species with complex invasion histories.
methodsWe capitalize on the well-characterized invasion history of the arboviral vector Aedes albopictus, which has resulted in genetically distinct native, old and invasive populations, and compared the reproductive capacity (fertility and fecundity), development (timing of egg hatching, oviposition patterns and egg hatching) and physiology (blood digestion and nutrient movement during oogenesis) across populations.
resultsThe results show that invasive populations are larger in size compared to the Ae. albopictus reference Foshan population and have a higher reproductive output than both an old population and the reference Foshan population. The higher reproductive capacity of invasive mosquitoes has both a physiological and genetic basis, and is accompanied by hybrid vigour, albeit at varying degrees across populations.
conclusionsThese findings highlight population-level differences in reproductive traits of Ae. albopictus populations that may be associated with their invasion success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.