Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41531545›Full record

ReviewLancet regional health. Americas2026

Advancing real-world evidence in Brazil: regulatory gaps and global lessons.

Nélio Cézar de Aquino, Cadiele Oliana Reichert, Luis Alberto de Padua Covas Lage, Hebert Fabricio Culler, Felipe Santa Rosa Roitberg, Vanderson Rocha, Flávia Neves Rocha Alves, Juliana Pereira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nélio Cézar de AquinoLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Department of Hematology, Hemotherapy & Cell Therapy - Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Cadiele Oliana ReichertLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Department of Hematology, Hemotherapy & Cell Therapy - Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Luis Alberto de Padua Covas LageLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Department of Hematology, Hemotherapy & Cell Therapy - Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Hebert Fabricio CullerLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Department of Hematology, Hemotherapy & Cell Therapy - Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Felipe Santa Rosa RoitbergBrazilian Company of Hospital Services (Empresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares - EBSERH), Brasília, Brazil.
Vanderson RochaLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Department of Hematology, Hemotherapy & Cell Therapy - Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Flávia Neves Rocha AlvesBrazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária - ANVISA), Brasília, Brazil.
Juliana PereiraLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Department of Hematology, Hemotherapy & Cell Therapy - Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulatory agencies are increasingly incorporating real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) into decision-making frameworks to complement randomized clinical trials. While some regions, such as the U.S. and EU, have developed structured approaches for RWE use, Brazil's regulatory environment remains comparatively limited. This study examines the status of RWE regulatory integration in Brazil through an analysis of normative documents, institutional publications, and selected case studies, using a comparative policy perspective. Although advances have been made in data standardization and the publication of technical guidelines, such as ANVISA's Guidance No. 64/2023, the practical use of RWE in regulatory processes is still nascent. Key challenges include fragmented data infrastructure, and limited intersectoral coordination. Addressing these gaps will require improved interoperability across health information systems, convergence of methodological standards, and sustained collaboration among regulatory authorities, academia, and data holders to enable consistent and scientifically robust use of RWE in the Brazilian context and, potentially, in other low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

BrazilBrazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária–ANVISA)Clinical trialsReal-World Data (RWD)Real-World Evidence (RWE)

Identifiers

PMID41531545
PMCPMC12795646

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.