ReviewLancet regional health. Americas2026
Advancing real-world evidence in Brazil: regulatory gaps and global lessons.
Review in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epigenetic plasticity and chemoresistance in cancer: mechanisms, biomarkers, and translational opportunities for real-world evidence.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regulatory agencies are increasingly incorporating real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) into decision-making frameworks to complement randomized clinical trials. While some regions, such as the U.S. and EU, have developed structured approaches for RWE use, Brazil's regulatory environment remains comparatively limited. This study examines the status of RWE regulatory integration in Brazil through an analysis of normative documents, institutional publications, and selected case studies, using a comparative policy perspective. Although advances have been made in data standardization and the publication of technical guidelines, such as ANVISA's Guidance No. 64/2023, the practical use of RWE in regulatory processes is still nascent. Key challenges include fragmented data infrastructure, and limited intersectoral coordination. Addressing these gaps will require improved interoperability across health information systems, convergence of methodological standards, and sustained collaboration among regulatory authorities, academia, and data holders to enable consistent and scientifically robust use of RWE in the Brazilian context and, potentially, in other low- and middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.