Evidence mapPaperPMID 41532017Full record

ReviewClinical hypertension2026

Approaches to deprescribing cardiovascular medications in patients receiving palliative care: a scoping review.

Gabriela Perez-Tamayo, Mohit Sirole, Elizabeth Fernandez, Krystel Chedid, Iram Sirajuddin, Rajesh Jha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabriela Perez-TamayoKansas College of Osteopathic Medicine (KansasCOM), Wichita, KS, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6613-6871
Mohit SiroleKansas College of Osteopathic Medicine (KansasCOM), Wichita, KS, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1137-3615
Elizabeth FernandezKansas College of Osteopathic Medicine (KansasCOM), Wichita, KS, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5860-2962
Krystel ChedidKansas College of Osteopathic Medicine (KansasCOM), Wichita, KS, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8009-7153
Iram SirajuddinKansas College of Osteopathic Medicine (KansasCOM), Wichita, KS, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3187-1115
Rajesh JhaKansas College of Osteopathic Medicine (KansasCOM), Wichita, KS, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0197-1314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scoping review conducted from April 1, 2025, to May 31, 2025, aims to use palliative care as a valuable opportunity to reduce polypharmacy and enhance patient-centered care in the final days of life. To conduct this scoping review with systematic components, a database search was conducted on PubMed and EBSCO to identify studies focused on deprescribing cardiovascular medications in patients subject to polypharmacy in nursing homes. Eligible studies were inclusive of human patients aged 65 and older, patients receiving palliative care or with a limited life expectancy and focused on examining the effects of deprescribing practices and other outcomes affected. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tools RoB-2 and ROBINS-I. The quality assessment was performed by two reviewers, and discretion was discussed until consensus was achieved. In total, 31 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the discussion of the review, and 11 of those were included in the quantitative data analysis. There was a notable variation in both baseline medication uses and rates of discontinuation seen across the studies. Rates of deprescribing for antihypertensives varied widely, reported as low as 16.6% in large retrospective cohort studies and as high as 87.8% in structured intervention trials using specified guideline tools such as STOPPFrail. Deprescribing should be routine in palliative assessments, guided by frameworks that consider prognosis, symptoms, and patient values. Limitations of this scoping review include heterogeneity of the studies, which limits direct comparability between them and difficulty in generalizing the findings to a broader palliative care population and assessing the quality of life (QoL) as only a few studies used a validated instrument or patient outcome, but not all were able to assess them in the same manner. Due to the need for properly structured deprescribing guidelines, physicians lack the time and tools to utilize shared decision making to their advantage in many places. The findings from this review suggest that a tailored deprescribing strategy could effectively complement traditional pharmacological treatments by decreasing potential adverse effects and medication burden in vulnerable populations, especially those diagnosed with cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseasesDeprescribingEnd-of-life careHypertensionPalliative carePolypharmacyShared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID41532017
PMCPMC12790966

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.