SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2025
The effects of berberine on depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite preclinical evidence for berberine's antidepressant potential, its pharmacological effects remain controversial.This study therefore systematically reviews animal research to clarify its mechanisms and support future clinical trials. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and OVID for studies on berberine in depression models up to March 20, 2025. Analysis used STATA 15.0 and Review Manager 5.4, with study quality assessed via SYRCLE's risk of bias tool. Results: The meta-analysis included 18 studies (338animals). Overall, berberine significantly reduced depression-like behaviors in animal models.Specifically, BBR increased total locomotor activity in the open field test (SMD=2.79, 95% CI: 1.55, 4.02) and time spent in the center zone (SMD=2.49, 95% CI:1.61, 3.37), reduced immobility time in both the forced swim test and tail suspension test (SMD =-4.42, 95% CI:-5.77,-3.07; SMD=-4.46, 95% CI:-6.21, -2.71), increased sucrose intake in the sucrose preference test (SMD = 3.72, 95% CI: 2.37, 5.07), and reduced feeding latency in the novelty-suppressed feeding test (SMD=-5.72, 95% CI:-7.63, -3.82). However, BBR did not significantly alter the number of square crossings (SMD=1.36, 95%CI:-0.07 , 2.79) or rearing frequency (SMD=1.66, 95% CI: -0.29, 3.61) in the open field test. BBR also increased the levels of body weight, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine,while reducing the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6. Discussion: Preclinical studies suggest that berberine may represent a promising therapeutic agent for the treatment of depressive disorders. Its antidepressant effects appear to be closely associated with the modulation of neurotransmitter levels,reduction of oxidative stress, and inhibition of inflammatory responses.However, methodological limitations may constrain these findings. Larger, more rigorous preclinical studies are needed for confirmation. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2025-6-0002, identifier INPLASY202560002.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.