ArticleBiology methods & protocols2026
Multilevel predictors categorization for post-CABG atrial fibrillation prediction.
Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative atrial fibrillation (PoAF) is a common complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Despite its association with increased risk of ischemic stroke, bleeding, acute renal failure and mortality there is still no ideal predictive tool with proper clinical interpretability. A retrospective single-center cohort study enrolled 1305 electronic medical records of patients with elective isolated CABG. PoAF was identified in 280 (21.5%) patients. Prognostic models with continuous variables were developed utilizing multivariate logistic regression (MLR), random forest and eXtreme gradient boosting methods. Predictors were dichotomized via grid search for optimal cut-off points, centroid calculation, and Shapley additive explanation (SHAP). For multilevel categorization, we proposed to use threshold values combination identified during dichotomization, as well as ranking cut-off thresholds by MLR weighting coefficients (multimetric categorization method). Based on multistage selection, nine PoAF predictors were identified and validated. After categorization, prognostic models with continuous and multilevel categorical variables were developed. The best XGB model employing continuous predictors demonstrated an AUC = 0.76. Models in which predictors were derived utilizing the multimetric categorization approach showed comparable predictive performance (AUC = 0.758). The main advantage of models with multilevel predictors categorization was their superior explainability and clinical interpretability in predicting POAF. Multilevel predictors categorization represents a promising tool for improving the explainability of POAF predictive development estimates. Using the developed prognostic models, it was demonstrated that the categorization procedures proposed by the authors ensure both high predictive accuracy and transparency of the generated clinical conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.