ReviewBiological psychiatry global open science2026
Electroencephalography-Based Machine and Deep Learning Approaches for the Diagnosis of Dissociative Disorders: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- EEG-based harmful brain activity classification using deep learning and feature fusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dissociative disorders (DDs), including dissociative identity disorder and depersonalization disorder, are complex and often misdiagnosed psychiatric conditions due to their overlapping symptoms with other mental illnesses. Electroencephalography (EEG), a low-cost and noninvasive neuroimaging tool, is a valuable means of examining the neurophysiological signatures associated with DDs. In this review, we aim to systematically evaluate how machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods are applied to EEG data for the diagnosis and monitoring of DDs, highlighting their effectiveness, limitations, and future research directions. We reviewed and synthesized studies involving EEG-based ML and DL models applied to DD-related data. The analysis focused on EEG biomarkers, model architecture (e.g., support vector machines, convolutional neural networks [CNNs], recurrent neural networks [RNNs]), feature types (raw vs. handcrafted), performance metrics, and reported challenges. Findings indicate that DL models, especially CNN and RNN, outperform traditional ML models by learning complex spatiotemporal EEG patterns. Key EEG biomarkers identified include altered frontal EEG power, disrupted theta and alpha rhythms, and attenuated P300 components. Hybrid and raw feature-based DL approaches yielded the highest classification accuracies (up to 98.3%) in related neuropsychiatric tasks. EEG-based DL techniques offer promising advancements in diagnosing DDs. However, challenges such as data scarcity, model interpretability, and generalizability persist. Future research should focus on explainable artificial intelligence, multimodal integration, transfer learning, and personalized EEG biomarkers to bridge the gap between research and clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.