ReviewInternational journal of biomaterials2026
Regenerative Medicine Advancements: A Systematic Review on the Combinatory Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma/Fibrin and Collagen.
Review in International journal of biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regenerative Medicine Advancements: A Systematic Review on the Combinatory Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma/Fibrin and Collagen.International journal of biomaterials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The regeneration of injured tissues remains a major clinical challenge. Among emerging biomaterials, collagen with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) showed promising outcomes, individually and in combination. Objective: To systematically review clinical evidence on the efficacy, applications, and safety of PRP/PRF and collagen for regenerative medicine applications. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Wiley Online Library, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov (search date: September, 2025). Inclusion criteria: clinical studies evaluating PRP/PRF and collagen formulations. Exclusion: preclinical only or nonoriginal research. Data were synthesized narratively. Results: Twenty-six clinical studies were included. Applications included gingival recession, periodontitis, tendon injuries, bone regeneration, peripheral nerve repair, and chronic ulcers. Most studies reported positive outcomes, though many lacked control groups or had small sample sizes. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion: PRP/PRF and collagen show potential for various clinical applications in regenerative medicine. However, randomized clinical studies are necessary to demonstrate their superiority to standard treatment and to standardize protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.