ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2026
Comparative pharmacokinetics of voriconazole between elderly and young adult patients: a population pharmacokinetic study.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Voriconazole (VCZ) belongs to the class of broad-spectrum antifungal agents, and it is commonly used for the treatment of serious fungal infections. Safe and effective therapy with VCZ is a challenge due to the narrow therapeutic index and high variability in pharmacokinetics between patients. Age of the patients can be a significant factor for this variability. However, no prior study in Pakistan has compared the pharmacokinetics of VCZ among young and elderly patients. Methods: A population pharmacokinetic model was developed on NONMEM software by using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data from 51 cancer patients. Patients were divided into two age groups, that is ≤ 65 years and > 65 years. The covariate influence on CL of VCZ was assessed by stepwise covariate modelling. The predictive performance and stability of the final model were evaluated by using goodness-of-fit plots and bootstrap analysis, respectively. Results: A one-compartment model with first-order elimination best described the data. The CL of VCZ in patients with age > 65 years was 3.11 L/h, which was significantly lower than the CL in patients with age ≤ 65 years, which was 6.46 L/h. No other covariate proved significant on CL and volume of distribution of VCZ. The final model demonstrated robust predictive performance and stability. Conclusions: The reduced CL of VCZ in elderly patients might be due to compromised hepatic enzymes in elderly patients. The dose of VCZ should be reduced in patients aged > 65 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.