ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025
Integration of peripheral blood-based systemic inflammatory indices and retinal imaging using interpretable machine learning for predicting anti-VEGF treatment response in macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO-ME) demonstrates considerable inter-individual variability in response to anti-VEGF therapy. While current research has predominantly focused on ocular imaging features and intraocular cytokine profiles, the role of systemic inflammation remains underexplored. This study proposes an interpretable machine learning (ML) framework that integrates peripheral blood-based systemic inflammatory indices with retinal imaging data to predict anatomical outcomes following anti-VEGF treatment in RVO-ME, and to elucidate underlying systemic inflammation-retinal structure interactions. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 202 RVO-ME patients receiving a standardized three-injection anti-VEGF regimen. Clinical data, retinal imaging parameters, peripheral blood cell counts, and derived systemic inflammatory indices were collected. Feature selection used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Boruta algorithms. Nine ML models were developed and optimized through Bayesian hyperparameter tuning with five-fold cross-validation for model selection, followed by independent test set validation. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) provided interpretation and mechanism exploration. A web-based risk calculator was deployed for clinical translation. Results: Central macular thickness before the third injection (CMT-2), minimum neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR-min), and minimum systemic immune-inflammation index (SII-min) emerged as key predictors. The Random Forest model performed optimally. SHAP and GAMs revealed that exacerbated systemic inflammation (SII-min and NLR-min) attenuated retinal structural treatment benefit (CMT-2), while concurrent elevations in inflammatory and structural burden markedly increased non-response risk. Counterfactual simulation suggested therapeutic gains from targeting systemic inflammation. The calculator based on the optimal model offers visual decision support for early non-responder identification. Conclusion: This study identifies systemic inflammation-retinal structure synergy as a key mechanism underlying anti-VEGF treatment heterogeneity in RVO-ME, highlights systemic inflammation as a modifiable therapeutic target, and supports personalized treatment strategies to improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.