Evidence mapPaperPMID 41533210Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026

Mobilizing community-led health promotion: Evidence-informed co-development of the Live Well PEI community mobilization platform and integrated granting program.

Shamara Baidoobonso, Emily C Clark, Laura Lee Noonan, Jiselle Bakker, Jennifer L May-Hadford, Karen A M Phillips, Melissa D Rossiter, Karen B Kuzmich, Brooks Roche, Travis J Saunders and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shamara BaidoobonsoDepartment of Health and Wellness, Government of Prince Edward Island, Chief Public Health Office, Charlottetown, PE, Canada. sbaidoobonso@ihis.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6516-7077
Emily C ClarkMcMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Laura Lee NoonanDepartment of Health and Wellness, Government of Prince Edward Island, Chief Public Health Office, Charlottetown, PE, Canada.
Jiselle BakkerDepartment of Health and Wellness, Government of Prince Edward Island, Chief Public Health Office, Charlottetown, PE, Canada.
Jennifer L May-HadfordPublic Health Agency of Canada, Regulatory, Operations and Emergency Management Branch, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Karen A M PhillipsDepartment of Health and Wellness, Government of Prince Edward Island, Chief Public Health Office, Charlottetown, PE, Canada.
Melissa D RossiterDepartment of Applied Human Sciences, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE, Canada.
Karen B KuzmichCanadian Cancer Society, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Brooks Roche, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Travis J SaundersDepartment of Applied Human Sciences, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE, Canada.
David SabapathyDepartment of Health and Wellness, Government of Prince Edward Island, Chief Public Health Office, Charlottetown, PE, Canada.

Funding

Public Health Agency of Canada Agreement #2223-HQ-000003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

interventionLive Well PEI provides individuals and organizations in PEI with information and tools to support healthy behaviours. This paper describes the development of the Live Well PEI community-mobilization intervention, consisting of a website and integrated community granting program for health promotion initiatives. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: (1) What is an effective design of a web-based community-mobilization intervention for community-led health promotion and (2) what lessons can be learned and shared for community-engaged, evidence-informed public health intervention development?

methodsIntervention development followed the Six Steps in Quality Intervention Development (6SQuID) process. Through literature reviews, jurisdictional scans, expert consultations, and community engagement, evidence for conditions that foster community mobilization was gathered and used to inform development of intervention components. The intervention was refined through iterative expert and community consultations.

resultsFour conditions that foster community-led health promotion were identified: accessibility of grant funding, availability of community data, resources to enhance capacity, and community collaboration. These conditions informed outputs of a Theory of Change. Intervention design that supports these conditions included website elements such as collections of evidence-informed health promotion interventions, stories of prior community-led projects, and community health status and needs information. The granting program integrates research and community feedback on project eligibility, grant administration and support for awardees. Findings from an evaluability assessment support pilot-testing implementation of the intervention.

conclusionDevelopment of the community-mobilization intervention provides a prime case example of evidence-informed, community-engaged public health intervention co-design. Learnings are applicable to community-focused health promotion initiatives across Canada.

Indexed as

Community engagementCommunity grant programCommunity mobilizationHealth promotionPublic health

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.