ArticleNucleic acids research2026
An AI-guided framework reveals conserved features governing microRNA strand selection.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are central regulators of gene expression, yet how cells choose between the two strands (5p or 3p) of a miRNA duplex during biogenesis remains unresolved. Here, we present a comprehensive, experimentally grounded framework that decodes the logic of miRNA strand selection. Using Caenorhabditis elegans as a model system, we developed a high-throughput platform enabling precise quantification of strand usage across developmental stages and in specific somatic tissues. To uncover the molecular grammar guiding this process, we built a predictive machine learning model trained on experimentally validated strand usage data. This AI-driven model, integrating 77 biologically informed features, accurately predicts strand preference not only in nematodes but also across vertebrates, including humans, revealing compositional and structural biases that are conserved yet functionally repurposed. Our analysis shows that strand selection is not stochastic but follows conserved, context-dependent rules shaped by cellular and developmental cues. To support the research community, we provide open-access resources: a database of strand usage profiles, predictive scores across species, and code and protocols via GitHub. This work offers the first unified, generalizable model for miRNA strand selection, establishing a paradigm that combines large-scale experimentation with AI to reveal a conserved, programmable layer of gene regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.