ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Comprehensive Analysis of the Conjunctival Sac Microbiome in Patients With Evaporative Dry Eye and Mixed Dry Eye.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrative analysis of the meibum microbiome in dry eye disease: from dysbiosis and diagnostic biomarkers to immunomodulation by Bradyrhizobium-derived outer membrane vesicles.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the differences in the microbial community of the conjunctival sac (CS) between patients with evaporative dry eye (EDE) and patients with mixed dry eye (DE), then, to compare it with previously reported ocular surface microbial of healthy people. Methods: CS swabs were collected from 10 patients with EDE and 10 patients with mixed DE. Bacterial DNA from these swabs were analyzed using 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene amplicon sequencing. Alpha diversity analysis assessed the microbial community diversity, while beta diversity was evaluated. Bioinformatic analysis of relative abundances and the functional annotations were performed at the genus level. Results: Results indicated no significant difference in alpha diversity, but a significant difference in beta diversity was observed (P = 0.001). Notably, Ralstonia and Corynebacterium exhibited significant differences. At the species level, the colonization rates and abundances of bacteria, including Comamonas denitrificans, Raoultella planticola (R. planticola), Pseudomonas mosselii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were significantly different. Functional annotation revealed that disparities in the microbial composition from CS between the two groups were accompanied by differences in the expression levels of genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism and histidine kinases, which were elevated in the mixed DE group. Conclusions: The microbial community structure of the EDE group was comparable to that of the mixed DE group. However, notable differences were observed in the relative abundance and colonization rate of certain specific microorganisms. These variations were associated with alterations in carbohydrate metabolism and histidine kinase expression. Translational Relevance: Corynebacterium, and Ralstonia may play important roles in the pathogenesis of dry eye disease (DED).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.