Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41533892›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Rapid ensemble encoding of average scene features.

Vignash Tharmaratnam, Jason Haberman, Jonathan S Cant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vignash TharmaratnamGraduate Program in Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jason HabermanRhodes College, Memphis, TN, USA.
Jonathan S CantGraduate Program in Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual ensemble perception involves the rapid global extraction of summary statistics (e.g., average features) from groups of items, without requiring single-item recognition and working memory resources. One theory that helps explain global visual perception is the principle of feature diagnosticity. This is when informative bottom-up visual features are preferentially processed to complete the task at hand by being consistent with one's top-down expectations. Past literature has studied ensemble perception using groups of objects and faces and has shown that both low-level (e.g., average color, orientation) and high-level visual statistics (e.g., average crowd animacy, object economic value) can be efficiently extracted. However, no study has explored whether summary statistics can be extracted from stimuli higher in visual complexity, necessitating global, gist-based processing for perception. To investigate this, across five experiments we had participants extract various summary statistical features from ensembles of real-world scenes. We found that average scene content (i.e., perceived naturalness or manufacturedness of scene ensembles) and average spatial boundary (i.e., perceived openness or closedness of scene ensembles) could be rapidly extracted within 125 ms, without reliance on working memory. Interestingly, when we rotated the scenes, average scene orientation could not be extracted, likely because the perception of diagnostic edge information (i.e., cardinal edges for typically encountered upright scenes) was disrupted when rotating the scenes. These results suggest that ensemble perception is a flexible resource that can be used to extract summary statistical information across multiple stimulus types but also has limitations based on the principle of feature diagnosticity in global visual perception.

Indexed as

Form PerceptionMemory, Short-TermPattern Recognition, VisualVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41533892
PMCPMC12782198

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.