Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41534073›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Promoting Mental Health, Physical Activity, and Healthy and Sustainable Dietary Behavior Among Practical Education Students in the Netherlands: Protocol for a Multiphase Participatory Research Study.

Daniëlla van Uden, Annemarie Wagemakers, Margot Peeters, Marloes Kleinjan, Kirsten Verkooijen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniëlla van UdenHealth and Society Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0008-6166-0105
Annemarie WagemakersHealth and Society Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1212-6888
Margot PeetersYouth Studies, Department of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8861-5744
Marloes KleinjanOrganisation of Healthcare and Services, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4545-5549
Kirsten VerkooijenHealth and Society Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0735-7024

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile a healthy lifestyle at a young age benefits youth now and later in life, not all youth have equal access to resources and support for adopting a healthy lifestyle. Most youth health promotion programs target the general adolescent population without addressing underlying equity issues. Similarly, participatory research, a promising methodology for the development of health promotion programs and addressing health equity, leaves youth in more vulnerable positions, often underrepresented. This research addresses these gaps by focusing on participatory research for health promotion program design with youth in practical education (praktijkonderwijs).

objectiveThis research has two objectives: (1) to gain insight into how to meaningfully involve youth in vulnerable positions in participatory research for health promotion by focusing on practical education students as a case study, and (2) to gain insight into possible outputs and outcomes of the developed health promotion programs.

methodsThe research in this protocol is part of the LIFTS (Healthy Lifestyle for Low-Literate Teenagers) project, which aims to promote a healthy lifestyle for practical education students using a participatory approach. The current research uses a multiphase mixed methods research design consisting of 3 studies. Regarding the first objective, we conduct a systematic literature review (study 1) and an empirical qualitative study at practical education schools (study 2). The systematic literature review examines current knowledge on empowering approaches to engage practical education students and similar youth groups as coresearchers in health promotion program design and implementation. The qualitative study explores if and how practical education students can meaningfully be engaged as coresearchers in participatory research for health promotion program design. In line with participatory research, we developed research methods in collaboration with practical education schools and relevant LIFTS stakeholders. Regarding the second objective, we will conduct a realist evaluation of the newly designed health promotion programs within LIFTS (study 3).

resultsOn April 11, 2025, the protocol for the systematic literature review (study 1) was ready and submitted to PROSPERO. In September 2025, we finished the data collection and analysis of the empirical qualitative study (study 2) and wrote the results. The realist evaluation (study 3) is foreseen for 2026.

conclusionsThis research contributes to the advancement of academic knowledge in the field of health promotion and participatory research with youth in vulnerable positions. We expect to deliver practical recommendations and lessons learned on how to actualize youth empowerment in participatory research for health promotion, which may inspire future researchers. Additionally, we seek to promote health equity in the Netherlands by contributing to the development and implementation of tailored health promotion programs for practical education students. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/84723.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth PromotionMental HealthStudentsAdolescentCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHealthy LifestyleHumansNetherlandsQualitative ResearchResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as Topicadolescent healthcommunity-based participatory researchempowermenthealth inequitieshealth promotionsecondary schoolsstudentvocational education

Identifiers

PMID41534073
PMCPMC12853082

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.