Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41534900›Full record

Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2026

Neoadjuvant lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in Merkel cell carcinoma: an investigator-initiated, open-label phase II trial.

Andrew S Brohl, Vernon K Sondak, Evan J Wuthrick, Younchul Kim, Zeynep Eroglu, Joseph Markowitz, Ahmad A Tarhini, Wenyi Fan, Justin Martin, Lymon Sneed and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04869137 (Neoadjuvant Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab in Resectable Merkel Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04869137 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

Neoadjuvant Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab in Resectable Merkel Cell Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteRan2021 to 2026Enrolled26ConditionsMerkel Cell Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Skin, Trabecular Carcinoma of the SkinArmsLenvatinib Oral Product, Pembrolizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Andrew S BrohlDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA Andrew.Brohl@moffitt.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0071-0534
Vernon K SondakDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Evan J WuthrickDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Younchul KimDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Zeynep ErogluDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2307-7030
Joseph MarkowitzDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2490-5464
Ahmad A TarhiniDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3193-9702
Wenyi FanDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Justin MartinDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Lymon SneedDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Matthew C PerezDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Amod SarnaikDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2337-5898
Michael HarringtonDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Rogerio I NevesDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4866-5215
Ricardo J GonzalezSarcoma Department, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
C Wayne CruseDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Jonathan S ZagerDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6886-4468
Kenneth Y TsaiDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5325-212X
Nikhil I KhushalaniDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3636-4143

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the success of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in the advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) setting, there is interest in exploring immunotherapy as a neoadjuvant approach. We report the primary results of a neoadjuvant study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in resectable MCC.

methodsIn this single-center, phase II open-label trial, resectable stage II-IV MCC patients received 6 weeks of neoadjuvant therapy with lenvatinib 20 mg orally daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenous dose every 3 weeks. Following local therapy, patients received continued adjuvant pembrolizumab monotherapy to complete a total treatment duration of 1 year. Pathological complete response (pCR) rate was the primary endpoint of the study.

results26 patients were enrolled, including 5 (19.2%) with clinical stage II disease, 20 (76.9%) with stage III, and 1 (3.8%) with stage IV. Following neoadjuvant treatment, 2 patients (7.7%) were unable to undergo planned surgery, one due to progressive disease and one due to toxicity. On intention to treat, 15 of the 26 patients (57.7%) achieved pCR. Among 22 radiographically evaluable patients, 16 (72.7%) achieved an objective response. At a median follow-up of 20.0 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) has not been reached. PFS significantly correlated with radiographic response to neoadjuvant therapy. pCR was associated with superior PFS, though this result was not statistically significant (p=0.22). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 14 patients (53.8%), most commonly grade 3 hypertension in 11 patients (42.3%). No grade 4-5 TRAEs were observed.

conclusionsLenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated encouraging efficacy with anticipated toxicity when used as neoadjuvant therapy for MCC. Further investigation of these promising findings is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04869137.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Merkel CellNeoadjuvant TherapyPhenylurea CompoundsQuinolinesSkin NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedlenvatinibpembrolizumabPhenylurea CompoundsQuinolinesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorNeoadjuvantSkin Cancer

Identifiers

PMID41534900
PMCPMC12815050

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.