ReviewRNA (New York, N.Y.)2026
Progress and challenges in profiling protein-RNA and protein-associated RNA-RNA interactions.
Review in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA binding proteins (RBPs) play essential roles in post-transcriptional gene regulation by interacting with a wide range of RNA targets. In addition to regulating RNA processing via individual RBP-RNA interactions, there is a growing appreciation of the regulatory impact of protein-associated RNA-RNA interactions that include both well-studied examples of small regulatory RNAs (e.g., microRNAs, snRNAs, snoRNAs, piRNAs) guiding ribonucleoprotein complexes to their targets as well as structured RNA elements defining the interaction landscape for an RBP. To elucidate the full scope of RBP-RNA interactions, CLIP (crosslinking and immunoprecipitation)-based methods have emerged as powerful tools. Even with the wide application of CLIP and variant approaches, these methods are still under significant ongoing advancement to better accommodate diverse biological systems and experimental demands and improve scalability. In particular, recent years have seen a focus on improved techniques to globally profile protein-associated RNA-RNA interactions. In this review, we provide a summary of recent improvements in traditional CLIP methods that improve the mapping of RBP-RNA interactions, with particular focus on those that specifically enable the profiling of protein-associated RNA-RNA interactions. We discuss the unique challenges involved in mapping protein-associated RNA-RNA interactions and highlight different ways current approaches address these challenges in order to offer a practical framework for researchers seeking to investigate RBP-associated RNA interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.