ArticleScientific reports2026
Short-term effects of haze exposure on clinical and subclinical cardiovascular indicators among adults in Nanjing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Haze has remained a persistent environmental issue in Nanjing, exhibiting notable temporal variation. Emerging evidence suggests that haze weather contributes to elevated cardiovascular mortality, yet the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We analyzed annual trends in haze days in Nanjing from 2005 to 2023 and found that the number of haze days decreased mainly during the warm season, while levels remained high during the cold season. Further, we analyzed 103,833 health examination records from local hospital (2019-2023) focusing on 12 cardiovascular indicators in relation to haze exposure. We employed a linear mixed effects model combined with a distributed lag nonlinear model to evaluate the associations. Stratified analyses were conducted based on demographic characteristics including sex, age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes and hypertension. Significant associations were observed for most cardiovascular indicators at lags 0-2 days, peaked at lags 3-5 days, and weakened at lags 6-7 days. Significant cumulative percentage changes were observed in several cardiovascular indicators over lag 0-7 days, including blood pressure (0.55%-1.10%), systemic inflammation markers (1.47%-2.10%), hematocrit (0.65%), homocysteine (4.33%), and myocardial injury enzymes (4.18%-8.62%). Increasing haze intensity was associated with a higher risk of all cardiovascular indicators. Stratified analyses revealed that males, individuals aged ≥ 50, those with higher BMI, and those with hypertension were more vulnerable to haze exposure. The haze during the cold season remains a significant public health concern in Nanjing, as even short-term exposure can significantly alter both clinical and subclinical cardiovascular indicators, including elevated blood pressure, acute systemic inflammation, increased blood viscosity, and myocardial injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.