Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41535369›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

On machine learning based QSPR analysis of amphetamine derivatives using regression models.

Muhammad Farhan Hanif, Atef F Hashem, Mazhar Hussain, Osman Abubakar Fiidow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad Farhan HanifDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Lahore, Lahore Campus, Lahore, Pakistan.
Atef F HashemDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia.
Mazhar HussainDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Lahore, Lahore Campus, Lahore, Pakistan.
Osman Abubakar FiidowDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Salaam University, Mogadishu, Somalia. osmanfiidow@salaam.edu.so.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we show the quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) for amphetamine derivatives based on neighborhood degree-based topological indices and NM-polynomials. By coupling such descriptors to both polynomial regression models and Random Forest algorithms, the ability of these two methodologies to predict different physicochemical properties (boiling point, evaporation energy, flash point, molar refractivity, surface tension, polarizability and SA) is analyzed. The modeling scheme reveals that the neighborhood-based indices carry information specific to structural complexity, connectivity and electronic characteristics important for stimulant-type molecules behaviour. cubic regression models are also found to be more capable of representing nonlinear structural relationship than quadratic ones while the efficacy and generalizability are greatly improved by extra Random Forest in particular for properties with strong dependence on molecular branching and electronic distribution. In conclusion, the results here presented confirm that NM-polynomial based descriptors effectively relate molecular topology with experimentally measurable physicochemical behavior, thus suggesting their computational use in predictive property modeling, early drug screening and cheminformatics-driven design.

Indexed as

Amphetamine derivativesMolecular graphQSPR modelingRandom forestRegression analysisTopological indices

Identifiers

PMID41535369
PMCPMC12864955

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.