ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2026
Characterization of the oral microbiome in the diverse South African population by PacBio HiFi sequencing.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Impact of Oral-Gut Microbiota Structure and Its Manipulation on RA Development and Management.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mounting evidence supports population-specific variation in the microbiome. This study applied PacBio HiFi 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to profile the oral microbiome of 62 individuals (aged 18-55 years) from the four major South African population groups (Black, Coloured, Indian and White). Bioinformatics analysis was performed using QIIME2 with taxonomic classification based on the SILVA database. Across all groups, Firmicutes was the most dominant phylum (80.92%), followed by Proteobacteria (8.94%) and Bacteroidota (4.22%). A total of 236 genera and 376 species were identified. Veillonella was the most abundant genus (27.57%), followed by Streptococcus (25.08%) and Granulicatella (15.54%). Streptococcus (30.40%) and Veillonella (41.82%) were the most abundant in the Indian and Coloured populations, respectively. Significant microbiome variation was observed between groups (β-diversity, p < 0.001), highlighting distinct population-specific microbial profiles. The Coloured population exhibited the highest microbiome diversity, likely due to complex genetic makeup and diverse cultural influences. The White population displayed the lowest microbiome diversity, likely due to more uniform lifestyle patterns. Despite these differences, three bacterial species, namely, Streptococcus salivarius, Veillonella atypica, and Prevotella melaninogenica were present in the majority of individuals across the populations, suggesting a core component of the South African oral microbiome. No significant associations were observed between factors such as sex, age, diet antibiotic use, lifestyle and oral microbiome variation. Several undetermined factors, such as psychological factors, stress, level of exercise, host genetics and immunity, could have contributed to the observed diversity. Our results present the first report of oral microbiome analysis of healthy South African populations by PacBio HiFi sequencing and warrant further research to provide insight into how these differences influence health disparities and potential application in forensics. KEY POINTS: • First report of the oral microbiome of healthy South Africans by PacBio HiFi sequencing • S. salivarius, P. melaninogenica and V. atypica define South Africa's core oral microbiome • Population-specific microbiome signatures can guide forensics and health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.