Evidence mapPaperPMID 41535719Full record

ReviewCell research2026

Gut dysbiosis in oncology: a risk factor for immunoresistance.

Andrew Allan Almonte, Simon Thomas, Valerio Iebba, Guido Kroemer, Lisa Derosa, Laurence Zitvogel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Cultivating the microbiome to enhance cancer immunotherapy.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew Allan Almonte *Tumor Immunology and Cancer Immunotherapy, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Inserm UMR1015, Villejuif, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8131-7805
Simon Thomas *Tumor Immunology and Cancer Immunotherapy, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Inserm UMR1015, Villejuif, France.
Valerio IebbaTumor Immunology and Cancer Immunotherapy, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Inserm UMR1015, Villejuif, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0716-306X
Guido KroemerUniversité Paris Cité, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France.
Lisa DerosaTumor Immunology and Cancer Immunotherapy, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Inserm UMR1015, Villejuif, France. deros.lisa@gmail.com.
Laurence ZitvogelTumor Immunology and Cancer Immunotherapy, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Inserm UMR1015, Villejuif, France. Laurence.Zitvogel@gustaveroussy.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1596-0998

Funding

CNIB (INCA) INCA_16698EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 955575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome is recognized as a determinant of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies in cancer. However, the clinical translation of microbiome science has been hampered by inconsistent definitions of dysbiosis, inadequate biomarker frameworks, and limited mechanistic understanding. In this review, we synthesize the current state of knowledge on how gut microbial composition and function influence ICI efficacy, highlighting both correlative and causal evidence. We discuss computational approaches based on α-diversity or taxonomic abundance and argue for more functionally and clinically informative models, such as the topological score (TOPOSCORE) and other dysbiosis indices derived from machine learning. Using retrospective analyses of metagenomic datasets from thousands of patients and healthy controls, we examine microbial patterns that distinguish responders from non-responders. We also explore how dysbiosis perturbs immunoregulatory pathways, including bile acid metabolism, gut permeability, and mucosal immunomodulation. Finally, we assess emerging therapeutic strategies aimed at correcting microbiome dysfunction - including dietary modification, bacterial consortia, and fecal microbiota transplantation - and describe how they are being deployed in multiple clinical trials. We conclude with a brief discussion of the ONCOBIOME initiative, which works with international partners to incorporate microbiome science into oncology workflows. By refining our understanding of gut-immune interactions and translating it into action, microbiome-informed oncology may unlock new therapeutic potential for patients previously resistant to immunotherapy.

Indexed as

DysbiosisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID41535719
PMCPMC12847903

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.