SynthesisBMC public health2026
Technology-facilitated sexual violence against women and its health impact: a mixed-methods systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Platform-Mediated Visibility of Exploitation Indicators: A Cross-Platform Analysis of AdultWork (UK) and CallEscort (US).Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTechnology-facilitated sexual violence (TFSV) is a significant public health issue, profoundly impacting women’s health. This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on the association between TFSV and mental and physical health in women aged 16 years and older. METHODOLOGY: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across seven databases (CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and Sociological Abstracts) up to May 2025. The protocol was pre-registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251053409). Data synthesis was conducted using a mixed-methods approach, specifically a convergent segregated design, in which quantitative and qualitative evidence were analyzed separately and later integrated during the interpretation phase to provide a comprehensive understanding of TFSV’s impact.
resultsAcross 21 studies (17 quantitative, 3 qualitative and 1 mixed-methods) from 11 countries, quantitative research consistently linked TFSV exposure to depression, anxiety, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), stress, and negative feelings or perceptions about one’s own body, capturing the prevalence and magnitude of these outcomes. Most quantitative studies were cross-sectional, limiting insight into long-term effects, and reported effect sizes were generally small to moderate. This review additionally highlighting that very few studies isolated the unique effect of TFSV from co-occurring forms of violence. Qualitative studies complemented these findings by detailing the enduring emotional and relational consequences of TFSV, including shame, guilt, loss of control, social isolation, and difficulties in intimate relationships, as well as coping strategies such as social support, activism, and selective digital withdrawal.
conclusionThis review provides evidence that TFSV is significantly associated with adverse mental health outcomes, challenging the misconception that it is less severe than offline violence. It underscores the need for clearer analytical approaches to isolate TFSV from other forms of violence and highlights critical gaps in research on physical health impacts. Evidence on physical health outcomes was scarce, with few studies reporting small associations with somatic symptoms, medication use, or general health, underscoring a critical gap in the literature. This evidence should inform public health responses, policy, and support services to address this pervasive form of structural violence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.