ArticleBMC health services research2026
Reasons for delayed medical treatment among cholelithiasis patients: a qualitative study based on the health belief model.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDelayed treatment of cholelithiasis can lead to serious complications, missed optimal intervention windows, and increased treatment complexity, thereby imposing a greater disease burden on patients. Understanding the reasons for delayed healthcare-seeking from the patient’s perspective is therefore essential. This study aimed to explore the multidimensional factors contributing to delayed medical treatment among patients with cholelithiasis—guided by the Health Belief Model (HBM)—to identify potential targets for intervention and provide a theoretical foundation for optimizing care-seeking behaviors.
methodsFrom January to June 2025, semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients diagnosed with cholelithiasis in the Hepatobiliary Surgery Department of Shanxi Bethune Hospital, using purposive sampling. Based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 patients who experienced delayed medical care were enrolled. A phenomenological qualitative research design was adopted, and the interview data were analyzed using Colaizzi’s seven-step method to identify, categorize, and refine key themes.
resultsFour major themes and thirteen subthemes were identified as factors to delayed medical treatment among patients with cholelithiasis: (1)Illness perception-related barriers (deficient disease-related knowledge, misinterpretation of clinical symptoms, underestimation of symptom severity); (2) Psychological and cognitive barriers in health decision-making (low self-efficacy in health management, risk-avoidant healthcare decision-making, unmet or unrealistic treatment expectations); (3) Healthcare system-level barriers (inadequate access to medical information, suboptimal initial healthcare facility selection, physician–patient communication barriers, and adverse or stressful experiences in healthcare navigation); (4) Social and structural constraints (insufficient family support, conflicts arising from social or other roles, and financial constraints).
conclusionThis study identified multiple interrelated barriers contributing to delayed care-seeking among patients with cholelithiasis, spanning illness perception, health decision-making, healthcare navigation, and socio-structural factors. Targeted strategies are needed to enhance patients’ recognition of symptom changes, strengthen confidence in healthcare decision-making, and improve their overall care-seeking experience. Additionally, promoting effective physician-patient communication and reinforcing social support mechanisms may help facilitate more timely engagement with healthcare services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.