ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2026
Knowledge and determinants of plant-based diet adoption among healthcare providers in a Buddhist teaching hospital: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlant-based diets are associated with reduced cardiometabolic risk and lower systemic inflammation. Nurses, as the largest group of healthcare professionals, play a central role in health education; however, limited research has examined healthcare providers' own adoption of plant-based diets and related knowledge, particularly in Asian healthcare settings. This study addresses this gap by examining dietary patterns, plant-based diet knowledge, and associated occupational and health factors among healthcare providers in Taiwan.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted between February and July 2024 at a Buddhist teaching hospital in southern Taiwan. Using convenience sampling and self-administered, data was collected from 344 healthcare providers, exceeding the minimum sample size required for multivariable regression and proportionally representing major professional groups within the hospital. Knowledge of plant-based diets was the primary outcome, while white blood cell and monocyte count, commonly used clinical indicators of systemic inflammatory status, were examined as secondary outcomes. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed.
resultsParticipants included nurses (n = 175, 50.9%) and other healthcare professionals. Most followed an omnivorous diet (n = 281, 81.7%), while 18.3% (n = 63) adhered to a plant-based diet. Nurses demonstrated lower knowledge scores than other professionals (mean 5.7 vs. 6.4, p < .001). Only 38.4% answered more than half of the knowledge correctly, and 71.3% relied on non-professional information sources. Adherence to a plant-based diet was associated with lower white blood cell and monocyte counts, suggesting a more favorable inflammatory profile within clinically normal reference ranges. In regression analyses, higher knowledge scores were independently associated with plant-based diet adherence (β = 0.277), fixed daytime work schedules (β = -0.154), physician-confirmed diagnoses (β = 0.128), and access to non-professional information sources (β = -0.110) (all p < .05).
conclusionDespite frequent abnormal health check-up findings, adoption of plant-based diets and related knowledge were limited among nurses. This well-powered hospital-based study provides novel evidence from a Buddhist healthcare context and highlights the need for targeted nutrition education and supportive workplace strategies to strengthen nurses' health literacy and dietary counseling capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.