ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2026
A comparative study of ordinal logistic regression and machine learning models for predicting women's malnutrition in bangladesh: evidence from BDHS 2022.
Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malnutrition, including both undernutrition and overnutrition, remains a major public health concern in Bangladesh, particularly among women of reproductive age. This study aims to identify key determinants of women's malnutrition in Bangladesh and compare the predictive performance of ordinal logistic regression and machine learning methods for predicting women's malnutrition using data from the 2022 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey. This study utilized data from 8,728 ever-married women aged 15-49 years extracted from the BDHS 2022. Six ML algorithms, including Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes, AdaBoost, and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), were compared with ordinal logistic regression by evaluating their performances using accuracy, precision, recall, [Formula: see text] score, Cohen's kappa, and area under the curve (AUC). Data preprocessing included SMOTE to address class imbalance, and models were assessed using stratified k-fold cross-validation. Findings of Ordinal Logistic Regression (OLR) suggest that age, division, residence, wealth index, current breastfeeding status, husband's education, currently working, and age at first marriage are the significant predictors of women's malnutrition. However, its predictive performance was modest, with an accuracy of 49% and macro-averaged [Formula: see text] score was 0.47. In contrast, ML models outperformed OLR across all evaluation metrics. Random Forest and XGBoost achieved the highest test accuracy (64%), with Random Forest attaining a macro-averaged [Formula: see text] score of 0.64 and achieved 66.2% accuracy (10-fold CV). Traditional models, such as OLR, are more explainable, but machine learning models demonstrate higher accuracy in classifying malnutrition. The findings can help policymakers and health professionals prioritize resources and plan targeted nutrition programs, considering the risk factors identified in this study, to lessen the burden of both undernutrition and overnutrition among women in Bangladesh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.