Evidence mapPaperPMID 41536112Full record

ArticleWorld psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)2026

Innovations to improve outcomes and uptake of psychotherapies for mental disorders: a state-of-the-art review.

Pim Cuijpers, Mathias Harrer, Toshi A Furukawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pim CuijpersDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mathias HarrerDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Toshi A FurukawaKyoto University Office of Institutional Advancement and Communications, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychotherapies have been found effective in the treatment of most mental disorders. However, substantial improvements are still much needed, and many innovations of therapies are currently being developed. We review the current status of promising innovations to improve the outcomes and uptake of psychotherapies for mental disorders, discussing the largest and most recent meta-analyses. Innovations are categorized into four domains: a) the digital field (including Internet-based interventions in general; mobile interventions; serious games; virtual and augmented reality; prescription digital therapeutics; blended therapy; avatar therapy; and chatbots/artificial intelligence-generated conversational agents); b) personalized treatments (research on predictors and moderators in large randomized controlled trials; use of individual patient data meta-analyses in personalization; machine learning approaches; personalized and modular therapies; and matching therapists to patients); c) new and improved therapies (cognitive bias modification; cognitive remediation; psychedelic-assisted psychotherapies; transdiagnostic therapies; research on effective components through factorial trials and component network meta-analyses; innovations in the understanding of the processes involved in psychotherapies, including research on common factors and the therapeutic alliance, and on the fidelity vs. flexibility question; research on prevention of adverse effects of therapies, the impact of increased session frequency or progress feedback on outcomes, and methodological innovations in trial designs); and d) dissemination and simplification of therapies (task sharing, digital interventions in low- and middle-income countries; and single-session interventions). These innovations vary in their maturity, from dozens of supporting trials to few or none. Methods to assess the strength of innovations suggest that no innovation will be a paradigm-shifting "silver bullet" that dramatically increases treatment outcomes, but that progress will only be possible through multiple, incremental improvements.

Indexed as

adverse effectscognitive bias modificationcognitive remediationdigital interventionsfactorial trialsinnovationspersonalized treatmentspsychedelic‐assisted psychotherapiesPsychotherapiestask sharingtherapeutic alliancetransdiagnostic therapies

Identifiers

PMID41536112
PMCPMC12805075

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.