ArticlePsychological medicine2026
EEG-based frontal excitation/inhibition balance as an objective biomarker for cognitive fatigue across multiple sclerosis and Long COVID.
Article in Psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Transdiagnostic Biomarkers and Mechanistic Heterogeneity in Cognitive Fatigue: A Response to Rudroff.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
- The dual diversity crisis in EEG biomarker research for cognitive fatigue.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCognitive fatigue is a prevalent and disabling symptom in neurological and post-viral conditions, including multiple sclerosis (MS) and Long COVID. Assessment relies largely on self-report, and no validated objective biomarker exists, limiting reliable diagnosis and treatment monitoring. The aperiodic exponent of the Electroencephalogram (EEG) power spectrum, reflecting the excitation/inhibition (E/I) balance, is a promising candidate biomarker. We examined whether aperiodic exponent values can objectively identify pathological fatigue and assessed their classification accuracy.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study, including 119 participants: 36 healthy controls, 33 with Long COVID-related fatigue (LCOF), and 50 with MS (23 fatigued and 27 nonfatigued). Resting-state EEGs were analyzed, and associations with fatigue ratings and group differences were assessed. Logistic mixed-effects regression models evaluated classification accuracy for fatigue status.
resultsLower frontal aperiodic exponents were associated with higher cognitive fatigue across participants. Fatigued individuals, regardless of diagnosis, showed reduced frontal exponent values compared with nonfatigued groups, while no differences emerged in occipital regions. Logistic regression confirmed that frontal exponent values significantly predicted fatigue status, improving classification accuracy beyond age and depression, with good sensitivity and specificity.
conclusionsThe frontal aperiodic exponent is a regionally specific biomarker of cognitive fatigue across MS and LCOF. Mechanistic interpretation suggests an altered prefrontal E/I balance, which could inform the development of targeted interventions to alleviate cognitive fatigue. It offers a clinically accessible tool to complement self-report, support trial stratification, and enable objective treatment monitoring. Importantly, its presence across distinct disorders highlights its value as a transdiagnostic marker of fatigue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.