Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41536423›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026

Benchmarking overlapping community detection methods for applications in human connectomics.

Annie G Bryant, Aditi Jha, Sumeet Agarwal, Patrick Cahill, Brandon Lam, Stuart Oldham, Aurina Arnatkevičiūtė, Alex Fornito, Ben D Fulcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Annie G BryantSchool of Physics, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2217-6520
Aditi JhaDepartment of Statistics and the Wu Tsai Neuroscience Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9892-5807
Sumeet AgarwalYardi School of Artificial Intelligence, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5714-3921
Patrick CahillCentre for Complex Systems, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6095-0473
Brandon LamSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health & Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Stuart OldhamSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health & Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9619-6102
Aurina ArnatkevičiūtėSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health & Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4098-7084
Alex FornitoSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health & Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9134-480X
Ben D FulcherSchool of Physics, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3003-4055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain networks exhibit non-trivial modular organization, with groups of densely connected areas participating in specialized functions. Traditional community detection algorithms assign each node to one module, but this representation cannot capture integrative, multifunctional nodes that span multiple communities. Despite the increasing availability of overlapping community detection algorithms (OCDAs) to capture such integrative nodes, there is no objective procedure for selecting the most appropriate method and its parameters for a given problem. Here, we overcome this limitation by introducing a data-driven method for selecting an OCDA and its parameters from performance on a tailored ensemble of generated benchmark networks, assessing 22 unique algorithms and parameter settings. Applied to the human right-hemisphere structural connectome, we find that the "order statistics local optimization method" (OSLOM) best identifies ground-truth overlapping structure in the benchmark ensemble, yielding a seven-network decomposition of the right-hemisphere cortex. These modules are bridged by 15 overlapping regions that generally sit at the apex of the putative cortical hierarchy-suggesting integrative, higher order function-with network participation increasing along the cortical hierarchy, a finding not supported using a non-overlapping modular decomposition. This data-driven approach to selecting OCDAs is applicable across domains, opening new avenues to detecting and quantifying informative structures in complex real-world networks.

Indexed as

Brain networksCommunity detectionDiffusion MRIStructural connectome

Identifiers

PMID41536423
PMCPMC12798651

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.