ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2026
Designing RNA sequencing experiments: A practical guide to reproducible gene expression analysis.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extracellular Vesicles in Cardiovascular Disease: Intercellular Signaling, Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Translation.Circulation research · 2026Review
- ROS-Centered Transcriptomic Regulatory Networks Linking Salinity Stress, Antioxidant Defense and Processability Traits inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Neuroinflammation in glaucoma: a myriad of cellular pathways and players.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026Review
- Advancing human ovarian biology in tandem with clinical care: considerations for collecting ovarian tissue for research after oophorectomy for tissue cryopreservation.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- From toxicogenomics to predictive toxicology and exposomics: defining the next decade of gene-environment research.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has become a cornerstone of modern biotechnology, offering a comprehensive and high-resolution view of gene expression that enables the discovery of novel transcripts across diverse biological systems. Its applications extend beyond basic transcriptomics, providing powerful tools for uncovering molecular mechanisms underlying disease, environmental responses, and chemical toxicity. In biotechnology and biomedical research, RNA-seq facilitates the identification of regulatory networks and biomarkers that inform therapeutic development, risk assessment, and precision medicine. However, reproducibility and data interpretation challenges persist, often stemming from suboptimal experimental design or inconsistent analytical pipelines. This review critically examines key methodological aspects required for robust and biologically meaningful RNA-seq studies including experimental design, sample preparation, sequencing strategies, and data quality control focuses specifically on eukaryotic cell RNA-seq workflows. We also compare leading sequencing platforms and discuss emerging trends that enhance the scalability and reproducibility of transcriptomic analyses. By integrating best practices with recent technological advances, this review provides a practical framework for designing high-quality RNA-seq experiments that support innovation in biotechnology, systems biology, and translational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.