ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2026
Exploring transformer models: Fine-tuning VS inference on relation extraction from biomedical texts.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transformer-based relation extraction and concept normalization using an annotated clinical trials corpus.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomedical data continues to grow significantly, coming from different sources and being updated daily. This makes manual extraction not only time-consuming but also impossible to keep up with due to this constant increase. In this context, biomedical relation extraction, which aims to automate the discovery of relationships between entities from free texts, becomes an essential step for knowledge discovery. While fine-tuning Transformer models such as T5, PubMedBERT, BioBERT, ClinicalT5, and RoBERTa has shown satisfactory results, it requires specific datasets, which are time-consuming to create and costly since they require domain experts. One ideal solution is the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), as it is directly applicable to a problem without the need for data creation. In this paper, we explore these generative large language models (LLMs) to evaluate whether they can be reliable when it comes to processing biomedical data. To do so, we study the relation extraction task of four major biomedical tasks, namely chemical-protein relation extraction, disease-protein relation extraction, drug-drug interaction, and protein-protein interaction. To address this need, our study focuses on comparing the performance of fine-tuned Transformer models with generative models such as Mistral-7B, LLaMA2-7B, GLiNER, LLaMA3-8B, Gemma, RAG, and Me-LLaMA-13B, using the same datasets in both experiments, showing that fine-tuned Transformer models achieve performance levels roughly twice those obtained by generative LLMs. These models require more pretraining on specific data, as demonstrated by Me-LLaMA (pretrained on MIMIC-III), which shows a significant improvement in performance compared to the model pretrained on a general domain. In terms of performance, fine-tuned Transformer models on domain-specific biomedical data achieved average scores ranging from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.