ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Research on interpretable machine learning models for diagnosis and staging of mild cognitive impairment.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Interpretable machine learning for Parkinson's disease diagnosis, staging, and biological mechanism exploration: a multicenter analysis.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Integrating anatomical priors and clinical semantics for MRI-based diagnosis and care support in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a critical prodromal stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD), further categorized into early MCI (EMCI) and late MCI (LMCI). Early and accurate diagnosis is essential for effective prevention and intervention of AD. This study aims to develop an accessible and interpretable machine learning model to facilitate early diagnosis and subtype staging of MCI. Methods: A total of 268 participants were recruited from the ADNI, including cognitively normal individuals (CN, Results: The combined model significantly outperformed unimodal models across all metrics, achieving macro_AUC = 0.92, micro_AUC = 0.91, and ACC = 0.81 in the training set, and macro_AUC = 0.87, micro_AUC = 0.87, and ACC = 0.76 in the testing set. The LR-based radiomics model ranked second. Models based solely on clinical neuropsychological scales or plasma protein biomarkers demonstrated comparatively lower classification performance. SHAP analysis highlighted neuropsychological scales (ADAS-Cog, MoCA) and radiomic features from critical brain regions (hippocampus, middle temporal gyrus, entorhinal cortex) as pivotal contributors to model efficacy. Conclusion: The integration of whole-brain structural MRI (sMRI) radiomics, neuropsychological scales, and plasma protein biomarkers significantly improves the precision of diagnosing and staging mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Radiomic characteristics derived from critical cerebral regions yield valuable pathological information that facilitates clinical interpretation. This methodology presents a promising strategy for the early identification and individualized management of MCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.