ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft versus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: a randomised controlled trial with 5-year follow-up.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03740022 (Assessment of the Results of Combined Anterolateral Ligament), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment of the Results of Combined Anterolateral Ligament (ALL) + Antero Crusader Ligament (ACL) Plasty Compared to Classical KJ Plasty in Isolated ACL Ruptures
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- What does a failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction really mean? An integrative view.Knee surgery & related research · 2026Review
- Article
- Short-term patient-reported outcomes following rectus femoris versus quadriceps tendon and hamstring tendon autografts for ACL reconstruction with concomitant anterolateral procedure: A prospective comparative study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Anterior tibial translation versus rotational instability in ACL reconstruction: Defining the problem before choosing the procedure.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of meniscal tears in ACL reconstruction using BMI, time to surgery, injury mechanism, and Tegner activity score: A temporally validated decision tool.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) rupture is common knee injury. Although ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is standard, graft failure rates remain high in young active patients. This study investigated whether combining ACLR with anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction (ALLR) reduces grafts failure compared with ACLR. Methods: In this prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial conducted at the Santy Orthopedic Center in Lyon, France, patients aged 18-35 years with symptomatic ACL rupture were randomly allocated (1:1) to ACL + ALL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft (ACLR + ALLR) or ACLR with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (ACLR). Randomisation was performed with a block size of four using telematic software by an independent study coordinator, with concealed allocation. Surgeons were informed of the assigned procedure on the morning of surgery. Outcome assessors were not blinded. The primary outcome was graft failure at 5 years, assessed clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by an independent sports medicine physicians not involved in the index surgery. Efficacy analyses were performed on the Full Analysis Set in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle, while safety analyses were conducted on the Safety Set. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID NCT03740022. The trial has been completed. Findings: Between November 11, 2016, and January 20, 2020, 593 patients were randomized (297 assigned to ACLR + ALLR and 296 to ACLR). The mean age was 25.0 years (SD 4.5); 447 (75%) participants were male and 146 (25%) female. Of these 593 patients, 556 (94%) completed a mean 5-year follow-up. Graft failure occurred in 12/283 (4.2%) with ACLR + ALLR versus 28/273 (10.3%) with ACLR (p = 0.006; adjusted odds ratio 2.54 [95% CI 1.27; 5.36]-p = 0.008). The number needed to treat was 17 overall, and 9 in patients younger than 25 years. Interpretation: In our study of young, active adults with ACL rupture, who are considered high-risk for graft failure, combining ACL reconstruction with anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ACLR + ALLR) significantly decreased graft failure compared with ACLR. These results suggest that ACLR + ALLR might be beneficial for young or highly active individuals and provide a basis for future research to refine patient selection, evaluate long-term outcomes beyond five years, and explore benefits in other subgroups of patients with ACL injuries. Funding: GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche funds the scientific activity at the Santy center.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.