ArticleAdvances in ophthalmology practice and research
Predicting intravitreal treatment response using ultrawide-field angiographic biomarkers in diabetic retinopathy.
Article in Advances in ophthalmology practice and research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- COL1A2 and APOLD1 Define a Dual-Axis Molecular Framework for Diabetic Nephropathy-Retinopathy Comorbidity: An Integrative Multiomics and Machine Learning Study in Mouse Models.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a sight-threatening retinal disease with pathological mediation by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections are commonly used to manage DR. Ultra-wide-field fluorescein angiography (UWF-FA) can assess DR severity and characterize the amount of non-perfused retina (non-perfusion area, NP), neovascularization (neovascular area, NV), and foveal avascular zone (FAZ). However, the association between anti-VEGF treatment and NP, NV, and FAZ characterized by UWF-FA is not well established. Methods: A retrospective, single-center cohort study involved eyes of patients with Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus with at least one UWF-FA image. The area of the FAZ, NP area, and NV area of UWF-FA images was calculated. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression was used to identify patient and eye-level factors that were significant predictors of FAZ, NP, and NV. Causal model analyses estimated intravitreal treatment effects on FAZ, NP, and NV over time. Results: The study included 705 eyes from patients with a mean (SD) age of 59.2 (13.2) years, and 56.3% were male. Eyes were treated with a mean (SD) of 5.6 (7.7) anti-VEGF and 0.63 (1.94) intravitreal steroid injections. Each incremental increase in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity of DR on initial presentation by clinical exam was associated with a 12.86 mm Conclusions: Intravitreal treatment was significantly associated with reduced NV and NP on UWF-FA. Intravitreal treatments were not predictive of FAZ changes. These findings suggest total retinal NV and NP areas may provide utility as UWF-FA biomarkers for assessing intravitreal treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.