ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
Considering brain state for individualized functional connectivity-based rTMS.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent endeavors to optimize the efficacy of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) treatment have focused on locating individualized stimulation targets using functional connectivity derived from functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) scans. Practically, this approach involves three main stages: target discovery, target localization, and treatment. As of now, each stage is typically conducted while participants are "at rest", meaning they are not performing a task or being presented with a stimulus. While growing evidence suggests that the effects of TMS are sensitive to the state of the brain at the time of stimulation, brain state has largely been overlooked during the first two stages (target discovery and localization). Here, we consider the potential importance of brain state at each stage of individualized rTMS, reviewing the relevant (and interdisciplinary) literature, and providing some exploratory example cross-state analyses. We also explore how manipulating and constraining brain state with tasks or movie-watching may provide opportunities to improve the reliability of individualized rTMS targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.