ReviewRegenerative therapy2026
Recent progress in immunomodulation-based strategies for bone repair.
Review in Regenerative therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A 'three-axis synergy' immunotherapeutic strategy for malignant bone tumors based on natural bioactives and bioactive materials.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Hydrogel-Based Immunomodulatory Strategies for Infected Bone Defects Regeneration: Remodeling the Osteoimmune Microenvironment and Future Perspectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Neuroimmune regulation of post-traumatic bone regeneration: focus on inflammatory switching and functional recovery.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone regeneration is a highly coordinated process shaped by the interplay between immune responses and osteogenic mechanisms. Immune cells such as neutrophils, macrophages, T cells, and B cells dynamically regulate the local microenvironment through cytokine secretion and signaling pathways, thereby influencing osteogenesis, angiogenesis and bone remodeling, while dysregulated or prolonged inflammation can disrupt healing. Growing evidence has highlighted the potential of leveraging immunomodulation to enhance bone repair. This review synthesizes recent progress in immunoregulatory strategies by comparing cellular therapies, molecular interventions and biomaterial-based approaches in terms of their mechanisms, their effects on osteogenesis and angiogenesis, and their translational potential. Particular emphasis is placed on immune cell specific signaling pathways, biomaterial design parameters including surface topography, porosity, ion release and stiffness, and emerging technologies such as immune responsive hydrogels, programmable scaffolds and exosome based delivery systems. Current findings indicate that mesenchymal stem cells and regulatory T cells not only provide progenitor sources but also reshape the immune milieu through paracrine factors and exosomes; cytokines, small molecules, microRNAs and pro resolving mediators effectively modulate inflammatory cascades to promote vascularized bone formation; and immunomodulatory biomaterials enable spatiotemporal regulation of macrophage polarization, particularly the transition from the pro inflammatory M1 phenotype to the reparative M2 phenotype. Collectively, these advances highlight that bone repair is fundamentally an immunologically driven process, and integrating temporal immune regulation with emerging therapeutic platforms offers a promising pathway toward precise and personalized bone regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.