ReviewClinical and translational medicine2026
Synthetic lethality in cancer therapy: Mechanisms, models and clinical translation for overcoming therapeutic resistance.
Review in Clinical and translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- C1ORF112 drives lung adenocarcinoma progression through e2f8-mediated transcriptional activation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Synthetic lethality between PBRM1 deficiency and PARP inhibitors: exploiting G2/M checkpoint arrest in colorectal cancer.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Disrupting the Undruggable: Emerging Modalities for Targeting Protein-Protein Interactions in Oncology.Biology · 2026Review
- Synthetic lethality in cancer: mechanism exploration and therapeutic applications.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Chemoresistance in gynecologic cancers: mechanistic insights and emerging platforms to overcome drug failure.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Novel Indazole Compounds as PKMYT1 Kinase Inhibitors for Treating Cancer.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and rationaleSynthetic lethality (SL)-based strategies hold significant promise for overcoming therapeutic resistance, a critical bottleneck in cancer treatment where cancer cells evade anticancer therapies, leading to diminished efficacy or treatment failure. The core of SL lies in exploiting tumour-specific vulnerabilities: drug-resistant cells often acquire unique genetic defects or compensatory adaptive responses, and SL strategies selectively target genes or pathways dependent on these vulnerabilities to induce specific cell death, thereby reversing resistance. CONTENT AND FOCUS: This review systematically elaborates on SL mechanisms and the multi-faceted nature of tumour drug resistance, then focuses on how SL counteracts resistant phenotypes by leveraging resistant cells' vulnerabilities. We further delineate SL applications in preclinical resistance models, highlight representative SL-related drugs and predictive biomarkers and critically analyse challenges in clinical translation.
conclusionBy integrating mechanistic insights, preclinical validation and translational perspectives, this review aims to provide novel insights for precision therapy and a foundational reference to advance SL strategies in overcoming tumour resistance and facilitating their clinical implementation. KEY POINTS: SL-based strategies exploit tumour-specific vulnerabilities in drug-resistant cells to induce selective cell death and overcome therapeutic resistance. This review dissects SL mechanisms, diverse drivers of tumour drug resistance and how SL counteracts resistant phenotypes via these vulnerabilities. It summarises clinical translational applications of SL from preclinical studies to trials, approvals and emerging targets, and discusses future precision therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.