ReviewAnnals of hematology2026
Next-generation CAR-T therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: bridging innovation with clinical translation.
Review in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preclinical advances and mechanistic insights of CAR-T therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: from target iteration to microenvironment regulation.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Exploring CAR cell therapies beyond CAR-T for myeloid malignancies.Journal of biomedical science · 2026Review
- Immunotherapy 3.0: Breakthroughs Steering the Next Generation of Cancer Control.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Advances in Nanotechnology for Lymphoma Treatment: Targeted Delivery, Immunomodulation, and TME-Responsive Therapy Strategies.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a high-risk hematologic malignancy with poor long-term survival and frequent relapse, sustained by leukemic stem cells, antigenic heterogeneity, and an immunosuppressive bone marrow niche. Although chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy achieves durable responses in B-cell malignancies, its application in AML is restricted by on-target myelotoxicity from antigen overlap with normal progenitors, heterogeneous and dynamic antigen expression, rapid T-cell exhaustion in suppressive microenvironments, limited manufacturing windows with compromised T-cell quality, and uncertainty in optimal infusion timing. To address these barriers, logic-gated and adapter CARs are engineered to broaden antigen recognition while limiting toxicity; nanobody-based CARs provide stable, low-immunogenic binding; gene-edited hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells permit AML clearance without prolonged marrow suppression; and metabolic or epigenetic modulation is employed to sustain T-cell function in hostile niches. Allogeneic CAR-T platforms offer a potential means to overcome manufacturing constraints and improve treatment accessibility. In selected settings, sequential CAR-T therapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation consolidate remission and restore hematopoiesis. This review integrates current and emerging AML antigen targets with engineering innovations into a structured translational framework, directly addressing the biological, manufacturing, and application barriers unique to AML, and outlining strategies with the potential to advance CAR-T therapy from experimental studies to durable clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.