ArticleJournal of community genetics2026
Preparedness for working with genomic medicine among Swedish non-genetics physicians - a nation-wide survey study.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomic Medicine Sweden: Advancing precision medicine at the national level.Journal of internal medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mainstreaming of genomic medicine requires that non-genetics physicians take on responsibility for genomic medicine tasks. However, previous studies indicate that physicians without formal competence in genetics often lack the experience, knowledge and means to do so. This study assessed the current practice of genomic medicine among Swedish non-genetics physicians (n = 133) using a survey designed by McClaren et al. (McClaren et al. 2020). 67.7% of respondents had been in contact with their regional genetics services during the last year, a majority of which having been so at least monthly. Somewhat fewer, 57.1%, had ordered a gene panel, exome or whole genome during the last year. About a third reported that financing can be a barrier to ordering tests. Only 37.6% reported feeling sufficiently prepared for working with genomic medicine in general, with greatest confidence levels found for taking the medical history. Only a third of participants expected that further developments within genomic medicine will affect their own ways of working. In comparison with previous Australian and UK studies using the same survey, Swedish physicians have more contact with regional genetics services, whereas proportions ordering tests and feeling sufficiently prepared for working with genomic medicine are comparable. Interestingly, Swedish physicians seem less prepared to take on increased responsibilities for genomic medicine than their international peers. We encourage researchers in other countries to use the same survey to allow for further international comparisons to inform policy.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.