ArticleIrish journal of medical science2026
Comparative effects of electronic and traditional cigarette use on pulmonary function, autonomic regulation, and exercise capacity in young adults.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundE-cigarette use among university students has been increasing. While substantial information exists on the impact of e-cigarette use on respiratory function, limited data exists on its early effects on cardiac autonomic function and exercise capacity in young individuals.
aimsThis study evaluated respiratory function, heart rate variability (HRV), and exercise capacity in electronic cigarette users compared to traditional cigarette smokers and non-smokers among university students.
methodsSixty-one healthy volunteers aged 18-35 years were divided into three groups: nonsmokers (n=20), tobacco smokers (n=21), and e-cigarette users (n=20). Respiratory function was assessed using spirometry, HRV was measured using a Polar H10 chest strap, and exercise capacity was evaluated using the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT).
resultsResults showed forced vital capacity was significantly higher in non-smokers than in traditional cigarette and e-cigarette users (P =0.013). No significant differences were found in spirometry parameters, HRV indices, total shuttle number, or ISWT distance. The percentage of predicted distance was significantly higher in non-smokers than other groups (p=0.018). The percentage of maximal heart rate and post-test heart rate differed significantly between groups (p = 0.004; η² = 0.172 and η² = 0.174), with traditional cigarette smokers showing lower values than non-smokers and e-cigarette users. Post-exercise dyspnea scores were significantly lower in e-cigarette users than nonsmokers (p=0.009).
conclusionBoth tobacco and e-cigarette use may negatively affect respiratory function and exercise performance of university students. Further research is needed to clarify the long-term health effects of electronic cigarette use in both healthy and chronic disease populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.